GT Sport: Sony Are Idiots

[DonFerrari]

Azzanation said:

DonFerrari said:

Nope I don't want to live out of anything. I'm just pointing that having less staff explain why they take a longer time. You don't even like simulation racing so stop pretending. I could care less about the pitstops, the discussion was about it being advertised and not implemented. What portion of GTS was advertised and not filled?

FM5 came with similar quantity to GTS while GT6 had a lot more, can you prove you criticized FM5?

You didn't understand my joke. I didn't took for real that you had been playing under shrooms, but thanks for confirming you were =p.

Well I have watched MadMen with HDR enabled and that was trying to put brightness to minimum it was still bleaking light.

On the color you seem right on the hard work to make they show right. Ars technica evaluation of 4KHDR only, pointed that he never saw so pleasant colors in any game ever. And commented on the Rosso Corsa of Ferrari and the strange yellow/lemon of a Toyota car that wouldn't really show right outside of GTS on HDR TV because games like Forza weren't fully commited to HDR.

So you mean the game isn't filled with content to justify you purchase right? Have you bought GT5 and GT6?

Read the ign review and I'm pleasently suprised as their previous review I saw was non-professional, they choose someone that like simulation and is giving a fair analysis to his liking and dislikes. But Errorist was going by the reviews of Eurogamer, Ars Technica, Red Bull, Racing magazine, and similar that looks objectively for what he cares not at reviews that look for what they think is important and people that doesn't even like simulation like you. Come again on how FH is simulator.

I dont have to like Simulations to comment about them, unless theres a forum rule that stats this let me know.

FM5 was barebones and deserved its reviews it got. FM7 is still a great game and earns its full price.

Errorist picks and chooses his reviews that suits him.. sounds legit. I am guessing there all the top 5 review scores.. i wouldnt be suprised.

You also laughed and mad fun of FM7 pitstops and yet you are willing to except a half baked game because PD is half the size of Turn 10 yet deserves your full dollar. 

Love your logic.

You can talk all you want but it will hold 0 weight when you are upping a MS game, dumping on a Sony game on a genre you don't care or know about.

Can you point me to any comments or threads you made to complain about FM5 or give props to GT6? What you think deserves a full price or not is irrelevant, I wouldn't pay more than 10 USD for a Fifa game, still it sell gangbuster every year at 60USD.

Nope he picks the ones made by racers not layman reviewers. He didn't even point scores and I read all of them and they had only the text with their likes and dislikes without any score given and were truly talking about the game proposed to be and not what the reviewer think it should be doing while not even caring about simulation, just like you are doing.

Nope I was making fun of they removing content they adverstised. Do you care to show me where did PD advertised something they didn't comply? They released the list of cars and tracks several months ago, talked about it being a e-sport game over 2 years ago.

Nope I'm willing to accept a full game complying with what they proposed to do, understanding that there is less content than I would like and that I would preffer a GT7 instead of a GTS.

You can love my logic all you want. If I pay 60 USD for a game that gives me 20h or less (most AAA games) why shouldn't I pay 60USD for GTS that gives me on SP alone more than 100h? I paid less for PC1 because it was full of bugs and uncomplished promises. Played for over 300h even though I saw several errors and thought it was too easy and excessively long in some parts.