| DonFerrari said: Yes to me anything below 9 is silly, have silly and trolling become the same thing? Have you played the demo and the full release? How different they are? So is 10h of analysis of the demo much less representative than the regular time reviewers put? The lack of SP (50-100h) should take out the score of an online only game? So should TF get cut to 60 or less? |
And to me the idea that someone could say any score below a 9 is not valid, before a game is even out, is silly. Whether you think there isn't much difference between the trial and full game is irrelevant, because you know, opinions and all. Your opinion of Gran "never gonna score one below a 10" Turismo is pretty flawed, it doesn't make the scores that reviewers give it flawed.
Titanfall scored somewhere in the 80's even without a SP campaign, and that was with reviewers shredding it for no SP and a lack of content. Luckily for them, the content that was there, was worth that score. In the case of GTS, seems the content that is there is only worth a 77 or whatever currently. lol @ 60 or less. Is GTS at 60 or less? Also, does Titanfall have a history dating back TWENTY years of fully fledged releases loaded with content? Come on now.
