By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

You already said you'd never rate a GT game below a 10, and that was before the game was even out and you could play the final version. It's not trolling to not blindly give a game a great score just because of its name.

Yes the 8 GTs (coming Prologue) I played I wouldn't give below than 10, because that is my personal evaluation. And there is quite a big room of maneuvering between 8 and 10 isn't there?

I have played the GTS beta and on it I could recognize all that I needed and that granted the 10 (played over 10h) on its premisse. It's far from being my favourite or having all I want, but it is even farther from being a bad game that should get lower than 8. Judging the game for what it have it is over 8 without any question and reviewers looking for what the game is and what is important on the game have done good reviews.

You said anything less than a 9 is silly. And this is before the game was even out. That a score of 8 is silly. You clearly have more of an agenda/bias for the franchise than any of these reviewers could possibly have. I mean, am I taking crazy pills? Anything less than a 9, for a game you hadn't even played yet outside of a trial, is silly? Come on now.

People are different. The lack of a single player component might not bother you much or maybe it does bother you a lot but the online makes up for it, but that's not the case for everyone. Why even have reviews if they all have to agree that every game mechanic should be rated the same way, lol.