| GribbleGrunger said: Still arguing about whether it's plural or singular? LOL |
Nope, the gramatical rule for the entity as a collective demands the use of singular... so the use as "sony are idiots" is the equivalent to "I are awesome".
Azzanation said:
I wouldnt put it past Sony. SFV also suffered after Sony brought the exclusiveness. GTS seems to fall on the same sword as SFV. |
Yes sure, Sony gone to Capcom and said "make a poor version of SF V because I want to see it fail". Where also Sony that demanded the failure of GoW and Halo on X1?
ThisGuyFooks said:
What difference would have made if the game released on Xbox? Ive noticed that Xbox fans blame Sony when an exclusive fails to meet expectations in sales, same happened with Lawbreakers when people literally tweeted Cliff when the game underperformed (badly!) saying things like: "Hah! That's what happens for not releasing the game on Xbox" Like the game would have been a million seller or something Have you seen the PS4 vs X1 sales ratio with most games? Have you seen Tekken 7 figures? The PS4 sales DEMOLISHED the X1 sales for the game, if SFV would have released for the X1 and sold what, 15% of what the PS4 version did, it would have flopped regardless. |
If it was exclusive to X1 it would sell less, if it was multi it could have sold more... but the logic on azzanation discurse is know on VGC.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







