Why do people call the 360, JRPG console this generation?

[Lone_Canis_Lupus]

starcraft said:

Lone_Canis_Lupus said:

 

The logic was right, but still flawed. Sony would have instantly announced the game if it was on their platform but Microsoft would have waited? Flawed. The game would be hyped then announced by Microsoft? Flawed, there was virtually no hype for the game. So what I can watch it on my PSP, SE/Tri-Ace totally intended on me watching it on my Zune. Flawed. The PS3 has shown no ability to show JRPGs even though pretty much none were released. Flawed. Your logic was flawed, but right.

What I'm saying is Tombi's logic could be right, even if flawed. You were right to make assumptions.? Assumptions make an ass out of you and me. Ass u me. No, he said getting a 360 for JRPGs this generation is very foolish. Because you assume the 360 will be the JRPG king this generation. Quit quote mining. You took that part out of context.

I clearly wasn't using retard in that way. It's kind of like how words can have a double meaning. I could still be insulting people without insulting actual mentally challenged people...but I will respect your wishes.

Logic cannot be flawed and right at the same time.  Thats a definitional paradox.  The only games website I visit is this one.  There were 5 or 6 threads on SO4 in the few days after someone brought the game up, and Sony fans savaged me at the mere suggestion the game could go multiplat.  Thats a fair bit of hype.

At the end of the day why did MS announce the game on June 10?  To interupt the MGS4 release with an announcement a game tonnes of Japanese gamers have wanted for ages will be 360-exclusive.

You attack me for quote-mining, but also say I said SE/Tri Ace intended my to watch the trailer on my Zune?  At the end of the day the trailer thing was your flawed logic, not mine.  Countless people in that thread told me the game was almost certainly PS3 exclusive, and couldn't POSSIBLY be 360 exclusive if the trailer was on the PSP.  They were wrong.

At the end of the day the PS3 HASN'T shown an ability to sell JRPG's.  That doesn't stop being fact just because no good JRPG's are out on the system.  In fact thats even worse, because it further minimises the likelihood large numbers of JRPG fans own the console.

 

 There was a fair bit of hype....here. Anywhere else, that logic is flawed. ;) See what I did there? Flawed doesn't mean wrong, it just means it could be wrong. You said there would be hype before MS announced it. The hype followed the announcement. And it was about which console it was going to be on, not the actual game itself.

You were right, but parts of that logic was flawed. This isn't black and white. There are many factors/variables that go into this. So you were right on some things but flawed in others.

 The zune thing was flawed because you were saying you could watch it on your Zune as if SE/Tri-Ace intended on you watching it that way. That's how it was flawed. I also agree, and we said almost certainly. Even you have to admit it seemed very likely at the time. We were wrong, we admited it when you gloated the other day.

You're right, it hasn't, but that doesn't mean it can't. You're saying that because it hasn't shown ability, there is no possible way a hyped JRPG wouldn't do well on the PS3. That's flawed. That's an assumption. You assume a hyped JRPG like Final Fantasy won't do well. 

You were right, but the logic wasn't completely backed up. Oh also "At the end of the day the trailer thing was your flawed logic, not mine." You said flawed logic wasn't possible. ;)