spurgeonryan said:
But that is two sites now. Edge gave it a perfect score.
@nintendo dogs comment
That game was perfect for its time and genre. What was wrong with it? |
Typical letting ones opinion cloud judgement. Its like Jim Sterlings BotW review. He was not being objective. Say waht you want about some gameplay mechanics like weapon durability, but the game is not a 7. Fine you don't like that mechanic. I hate the autoregen health in shooters, but that don't make me rate every game that has them super poorly. Zelda's polish, scope, replayability, physics, puzzles, ect are to a level that are unheard of. I mean compare BotW and Skyrim. Both open world games that are huge in scope and broke many grounds. I love both games hugely and sunk 100's of hours in both. But one you can scour youtube and maybe find a couple bugs in Zelda. The other has enough bugs to populate skyrim with them and it woudl look natural.
As a reviewer or even a person onliune one has to look more objective. Even take movies. Sex in teh City the movie. How would i rate that movie? I have not seen it, but I imagine I would utterly hate the movie. My personal opinions woudl like to give it like 2/10 or something. It's completely not my movie, not my genre, not my humor, not my everything. Yet another movie, say Jet Li's "the One" I thoroughly enjoy. Without objectviity I woudl rate it say 8/10. But that is completely taking my personal feelings into it. I like actions, hate whatever Sex in city is. They probably should in the grand sceme be rated the same.
