By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Turkish said:
DonFerrari said:

For what I know you had the licences, challenges, time trials and arcade on off-line.

Which is barebones. I just want to race, quickly test things out especially in a demo, not trying to take licenses.

GT Sport is basically GT7 Prologue, they couldn't name it 7 because of all the shit they'd get for lack of content.

Pathetic after 4 years. PD has really dropped the ball on this one.

Saying it barebones and that it doesn't exist are different things.

Giving it the name of a championship instead of you entering a circuit and setting a race isn't all that different.

Have you followed their announcements that this was supposed to be GTS since inception? That they could have called GT7 but saw it on a different approach?

ChaosReich said:
DonFerrari said:

Please detail.

The reviews assure me that this is the driving experience that i want but dissuades me with it being so lacking in content that i deem enjoyable. I loved the license test, the fun addicting car collecting, and the enjoyable grind of playing just one more race in its many different offline career mode events of the previous games

I understand. I will hold my buying for some months because of other reasons, but maybe the game will have a lot more content when I can buy it.

LudicrousSpeed said:
DonFerrari said:
For me GT games are all 10/10, but I can't objectively see any of them getting less than 9/10 for what they offer and no game on the category really upping them enough to validate those silly 6-8 grades.

Satire? Satire.

As for GTS, 77 is lower than I expected, but after reading that you can't even buy parts and upgrade your cars any more (you now do generic level up style upgrades apparently), fuck this game lol. A shame what the franchise has become.

What is the satire?

Do you upgrade Group cars with different parts during? For what I remember they are a little less static.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."