| cycycychris said: Fire Emblem Warriors looks such like a mediocre game to me that I just can't find a reason to get excited for it. |
You have had that Hyrule Warriors gif in your signature for as long as I can remember, so I'm assuming you liked that game, and if so I'd think that would be a reason to be interested in Fire Emblem Warriors. I mean they're Warriors games, if you enjoy one, you'll most likely enjoy the others. Quality-wise HW n FEW are pretty even I'd say, both having pros and cons over the other. I'm more excited for FEW than I ever was for HW, admittedly a lot in part because I'm way more a FE fan than a Zelda one, but I also because I like most of the gameplay changes. Being able to switch between units at will, ability to command A.I. allies to move how you want, and traditional FE elements like the weapon triangle/pair ups/class changes/etc. That all should make the gameplay more fun n interesting than it was in HW.
| AngryLittleAlchemist said: So i've been wondering, do you guys think Nintendo beat 2014 this year in terms of games? In 2014 we had Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze, Mario Kart 8, Bayonetta 2, and Smash Bros 4 And this year we've had Breath of the Wild, Splatoon 2, Super Mario Odyssey, and Xenoblade 2 |
What's the criteria for games we're counting here, considering you have Bayonetta 2 listed which I'm sure you're aware is a 3rd party game, and you left out ARMS which is purely Nintendo. I can't agree with any sorting method that excludes the surprise greatness that was Mario + Rabbids. I'm just gonna take the Wii U's 2014 and Switch's 2017 line-ups as whole, which, even when removing my extreme Splatoon bias, I'd still say 2017 is a lot better. No droughts, just a consistent stream of quality games, even if some are enhanced ports, that's still better than the the nothingness Wii U endured.
