By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DonFerrari said:

Your list of points had product/service as meaningfull to the rank. Power and online infra is part of the part/service not the trust. Blame the ranking so.

Power is not a factor of trust.  That is a factor of desire.  Saying you don't trust Nintendo to make a powerful console is frankly silly when you are measuring the trust of the product to do what it is supposed to do.   If they release a Wii and you are expecting the power of a PS3, that's not a valid claim to say they are not trustworthy in their products.

If they make a Wii, claim it has the power of a Wii and it does, that is trust in the product.

Expectations derived from personal hopes and desires that are outside the scope of the intent of the company is your own fault.

Saying "I don't trust them to make a powerful console" is not what they are measuring as "trust".  You could easily reverse your statement to say "I trust Nintendo to make an lower powered console".  Both are correct from your perspective and both say trust or don't trust.  But again, that's not what it is measuring.

And how many times need I repeat that you yourself put that "product/service" was an evaluation category and that would fit? Or that trust isn't limited by what you think is trust, trust is much more expansive than limiting to ethics.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."