Ka-pi96 said:
Nem said:
Sure. So you prefer a Social progression example? Slavery. Used to be the norm, and it became shuned upon with progressivism.
Was it for the worse? Doesn't fit your agenda eh?
Really, don't care about your agenda on this progressivism you are trying to bring though.
This measure is a well intended change and while i think it's trying to jump too far in, it has a good intention and perhaps isn't the best idea. Yet, this by no means supports whatever nonsense you are trying to bring across.
|
Legalising poisoning people is a good intention?
|
No, ending discrimination is a good intention. Yet, this is misguided, as i repeatidly said.
Aeolus451 said:
Nem said:
Sure. So you prefer a Social progression example? Slavery. Used to be the norm, and it became shuned upon with progressivism.
Was it for the worse? Doesn't fit your agenda eh?
Really, don't care about your agenda on this progressivism you are trying to bring though.
This measure is a well intended change and while i think it's trying to jump too far in, it has a good intention and perhaps isn't the best idea. Yet, this by no means supports whatever nonsense you are trying to bring across.
|
Again, stop trying to claim trophies for progressivism that it didn't earn. Progressivism as an polititical ideology of today that's "progressive" in name only. It doesn't progress anything forward but rather everything in a circle to the point that often leaves things worse off like in this case.
This recent act of liberal lunancy is not well intended but rather a perfect example of how much thought goes into laws before democrats pass them.
|
I'm sorry but you are full of the proverbial BS. Not even worth continuing this.
You are pushing an agenda and picking and choosing what interests you. That BS might run with some of your American buddies but it sure won't with an european.
