By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NATO said:

For crash physics, neither game should bother with it, the only time crash physics is needed in a driving game is for rally titles or Baja, 90+% of impacts on an actual track result in pace cars being sent out while they clean up the mess and clear the circuit, and the car(s) that had the impact being removed from the race entirely, so to argue over which crash physics are realistic when neither is anywhere near realistic, is laughable.

If you hit a tire wall at 100kph in either game, you can keep on racing, that isn't realistic, if you get side swiped in a corner, at worst, theres minor wing deformation, broken glass and some scratch textures, in reality that's a cracked or completely snapped control arm, suspension component, obsctruction of wheel by bent wing, destroyed rim, etc.

I know crash physics as hit restart.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."