By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem on 10 October 2017
Edit Thread
Aeolus451 said:
Nem said:

Don't try to use this to generalise your propaganda.

This is a well intended but bad measure. This has nothing to do with Progressivism. Without progress you would still be living in caves.

 

I know not everyone reads the articles, but this is what he said to people actually commiting the fellony:

Anderson said the answer could be to extend tougher penalties to those who expose others to other infectious diseases.

 

So, he is actually defending harsher penalties to those commiting the felon. He does want to lift the stigma, wich is understandable, but i'm not sure prudent.

Oh don't give me that. I knew of this outside of this thread. This is the result of progressivism and don't try to pretend that it got humans out of caves. Also, it doesn't represent actual progress or moving things forward. It's just a sales slogan. The political ideology didn't exist until recently. That was created by democrats, passed by and made into law by democrats for a state of democrats. So yes, it's their baby. 

This in no way lifts the stigma of AIDS. If anything it will make it worse by decriminalizing knowingly infecting others which is giving others a death sentence. 


Sure. So you prefer a Social progression example? Slavery. Used to be the norm, and it became shuned upon with progressivism.

Was it for the worse? Doesn't fit your agenda eh?

Really, don't care about your agenda on this progressivism you are trying to bring though.

This measure is a well intended change and while i think it's trying to jump too far in, it has a good intention and perhaps isn't the best idea. Yet, this by no means supports whatever nonsense you are trying to bring across.