Ka-pi96 said:
Being attacked by an unarmed mob... probably a few broken bones but chances are they will live. Being attacked by a gun weilding mob... they're now a bullet riddled corpse. I know which one I'd prefer... |
Sorry to burst that to you but several of them end up dead after the mob linch.
Criminals already own weapons, knifes and others... and if they mob anyone alone wouldn't be able to do anything. But be that mob armed and also regular citizen unless the mob can attack completely hidden they will be at risk of being shot not only by the victim, but others surrounding.
I know I would preffer the choice to defend myself. Probably several rape victims would as well.
Ka-pi96 said:
Compared to every other developed country in the world... definitely! By far the most dangerous of them all! Guns for nobody is so much safer than guns for everybody. |
And when the government is unable to get rid of the guns for everyone then you are on the gun only for criminals?
@the tight control on guns... USA can't prevent drugs, illegals and other entrances in their country, but they would totally control guns right?
I find it funny that people that defend to make drugs lawfull because of the cost and violence on the drug war are the same that think a war on guns would solve the gun issue...
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."