What is a political issue that you want to understand the opposite viewpoint more?

[vivster]

Ka-pi96 said:

vivster said:

In the end it really comes down to morals, which are inherently irrational. A more rational approach would allow even postnatal abortions. A human baby is nothing but a lump of flesh with no ability to sustain itself and no sense of self. Which makes it less of a living being than a common rat.

That's why I couldn't care less when a baby dies. A baby can just be redone in 9 months with a bit of effort. The bigger tragedy is when someone aged 20-40 dies. Those people actually had lives, they wanted to keep their lives and they contributed to society. A baby is worth nothing.

That's why I find it kinda amusing when people argue over fetuses and month old clumps of cells when even a full grown and born baby is nothing but useless flesh.

Pretty sure somebody earlier criticised the argument that abortion was equivalent to post-birth infanticide. But here you go, somebody arguing for exactly that.

Someone had to. Screw babies. My left leg has more value to this society than any random baby. Much more expensive to replace.