By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

That still let's plebians have equal say to people with taste though. Little Timmy with four games under his belt has just as much say so as Spike with hundreds of games under his belt. 

That's why I said Forza 7.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/store/top-paid/games/xbox

2.5 out of 5 stars.

Metacritic: 87
Metacritic user score: 62
OpenCritic: 85

Which one of the above four do you think is the most trustworthy source?

The 2.5 stars would be the most trustworthy out of all of them. But at the same time I don't think Forza 7 is bad enough to warrant a 2.5/5. But then again, maybe it is that bad. I haven't played it. Even though somebody bought Forza 7 and played it that doesn't stop them from posting a review of 0 stars for it out of spite. People that leave reviews like "It had stairs in it and I hate stairs 0/10 worst game evar!", or "11/10 because it had aliens in it and I like aliens. U must buy!" shouldn't have as much say so as people that write a serious and well thought out review, with a reasonable score attached. This is why I want a site that rations out extemely high or low scores, so that people have to think carefully about when they pass them out.