What are you willing to sacrifice for 60 FPS or higher?

[RaptorChrist]

CrazyGamer2017 said:

RaptorChrist said:

Quit acting so naive. It's clear after reading through this thread that you have no interest in having a legitimate debate, as you keep asking questions that you already know the answer to (although you would never admit it).

And another thing: framerate is not correlated to hardware power. Did you know that the Gameboy could output at 60 FPS? The reason why many games run at 30 FPS or worse is because some developers would rather sacrifice performance for better visuals.

You also have this fascination with trying to get away with calling the Switch underpowered. Didn't the Switch launch with one of the most powerful mobile processors on the market? The points you are trying to make are so... pointless. What do you have to gain from calling the Switch underpowered? Come on, man, it makes you look desperate.

First I was answering someone's post. Second quit assuming my intentions. Third learn to live with other people's opinions cause reacting all hurt makes you pass off for a fanboy rather than someone who wants to exchange ideas. Fourth a legitimate debate is BY DEFINITION one where people exchange DIFFERENT or OPPOSED opinions, but maybe to you a debate is one where people agree all the time... And fifth what questions am I asking, what are you talking about? My first post in this thread was about all 3 systems and what seemed in my opinion to be their weakness, it's not my fault if only Nintendo gamers reacted to my opinion but that's fine as long as it is not fanboys and I don't wish to call you that but you are getting really close to living up to the name, man.

Do you feel so insecure about your prefered system that you need to lash out like that?

Cheers mate.

Ugh, disgusting. I bet you typed that with one hand.