How can people support a political view that not only does not benefit themselves, but also hurts many, many people. Taking away health care that is very adequate is a perfect example. Agreeing with tax cuts on wealthy while you are working class and will see tax rises or wage cuts or the removal of jobs domestically is another example.
My biggest one right now is trying to understand why people will work harder to avoid a legitimate sociopolitical issue than just addressing it head on and resolving it. Police violence (saying there is other violence is not in any way a solution to that specific problem. It is, at best, excusing the topic. It also falls into the supporting a group that you are not part of with no benefit to you), kneeling in protest (It became about military and a flag but that is because people want to avoid the actual issue. However, more than a year later, the topic is more prominent than if they had just addressed it a year ago and moved on), black lives matters (they are a terrorist organization akin to the KKK according to some people. Sure, that is for the most part completely unfounded, but you know... lets run from the issues they are actually trying to present and re-victimize the victims), and the treatment of Muslims/Arabs (do I even need to explain?) are all examples of this. Why not just attack the issues specifically head on and make the country better. Avoiding the problems presented, especially by re-victimizing the victims, does not go unnoticed and in case you are unaware, it has never made things better.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000
