fory77 said:
i think that 'anarcho' part is saying something |
This was more or less the ultimate aim of Lenin though. The state was more a means to the end that is a stateless communist nonsense utopia they envisioned. You could argue that anarcho-communism is the ultimate expression of it in the same way one could argue anarcho-capitalism is the ultimate expression of right libertarian thought.
I'm just pointing out the hypocracsy of claiming to be anti-facist when one espouses an idealogy that is more or less identical to facism. Also, I don't see how anarcho-communism could come about without a massive Stalin / Hitler style super state where all competing ideas / free expression of ideas are forbidden. The irony of anarcho-communism is that it would require a state to be enforced ... which is why I question the "anarcho" portion of it. Why not just call it communism, it will require a state to exist in order to enforce its idealogy.
