By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GhaudePhaede010 said:
DonFerrari said:

being able to do better =/= intentional self sabotage.

What kind of sabotage is it? This is EA... a company that should know how to do it right. And you keep giving them the benefit of the doubt, right? Why? If they are so smart and looking for profit, how can people on a message board, yourself included, see these monsterous and glaring issues and think nothing of it. Either EA as a company are dumb as fuck seven times over or they are self sabotaging (you could still argue that being dumb as fuck is unintentional self sabotage but I digress...). I honestly think (due to their marketing and sales of other titles) EA are not stupid so that leaves me with the conclusion that they do not care or that they want this game to underperform (see: self sabotage).

Again, I am a rational man. I have read every reply and I have yet to see anything that provokes me to think EA is somehow not self sabotaging. However, you have to admit at this point that your position is just as weak as your opposition. Therefore, condescending the opposition can be seen as hypocrisy.

Have you ever heard of cost of opportunity and ROI? A version that do only 1% of the market can very well be a version that isn't much attractive and as well doesn't deserve much attention.

EA not being stupid and Nintendo 3rd party games usually failing is were you can see why they would invest little.

Nope I'm not positioning me weakly, just considering you are looking at the point on a too emotive position.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."