By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:

Probably not that much. But considering how many hours they would have to capture, post process and etc it isn't cheap as well. Will we put it on the sabotage front as well? Several games on PS4 store doesn't have trailers, some even AAA.

The question that needs to be asked is whether EA met acceptable minimum standards to market their game. Since every publisher on Switch provides a trailer as well as gameplay screenshots, it's certainly odd that EA - one of the biggest publishers around - didn't do it. It's perfectly fair to ask if EA wants the game to sell well.

What are the acceptable minimum standards? Does Nintendo have any policy for their eshop games? From what I heard Nintendo was responsible for Fifa 18 market on their eshop, heard here in this thread.

GoOnKid said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes because you put as much marketing investiment on the 60% market as in the 1%.

It's 1% of the UK market, not worldwide. Learn the difference.

Edit: What I mean is that one single trailer would lift the sales potential globally, not just in the UK. So a cost argument shouldn't brought up here. The costs can't be higher than a couple hundred sales. Seriously.

We don't have the numbers for the cost to be sure.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."