By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
DonFerrari said:

I would fell cheated if the dlc was needed to enjoy the game be it available in my console or not. I fell much more cheated if a game that I always got on my console was highjacked for one year.

Nope I don't see irony. MS doing it on x360 wouldn't look desperate. They doing on x1 looks like even more after it was revealed bluepoint is looking to make it on ps4.

How would you ever know if the DLC would provide a better experience for the game if you have no opportunity to enjoy it.  You can only guess or just say to yourself "I do not care" but whether you cared or not you have no choice but to take it.  You paid your money for the game and the developer locked you out of content.  So for you, since you do not purchase DLC this is no problem but for many that do purchase DLC, this is a huge problem.  As I have stated for me I do not care as well so when i purchased Destiny for the Xbox, I knew those DLC would not be coming to the Xbox anytime soon but I cared little.

As for a game that will not come to your system for a year, well its the business.  You feel cheated as a PS only gamer but then how do you think the Xbox gamers feel.  If MS was the only company doing this you could well ding them for it but since they all do it, its just part of the industry.  I am sure when you play the 3rd party timed or full exclusives on the PS, you do not care at all if those games ever see the light of day on the X1.  If anything you are comfortable that Sony gets those exclusive so you do not have to think about any other system but the PS.

As for MS being desparate, well I guess as with anything people can believe whatever they want but you still have not provided any proof why this is desperate since this is standard MO from MS.  Desparation would be to do something you do not do to change an outcome of an event.  Also you continue to just totally ignore that MS has a publishing agreement with blue.  As I mentioned as a business, why would you let your competitor upstage a move you made for a popular product to come to your system and not make a counter move.  Its like you believe MS and Sony is playing the same game as gamers interest.  Their are moves and counter moves and whether MS was in first or last in installbase they would still make the same moves.

How would I know? Maybe internet? And by playing the game you'll also know if it fells missing. You paying for the base game not for the missing dlc.

 

I don't care much. But you make it sound like missing skin is more relevant than full game 1 year lock. Both are business. I preffer 1st party anyway.

 

Ok as you said you can consider it not desperation if you want. But you also already accepted that they manage this very bad.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."