By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 04 October 2017
Edit Thread
Mandalore76 said:
deskpro2k3 said:

 

 

well you saved me the effort from defining it for you, but that doesn't make my statement untrue.

I never said exclusives nor did I mention nintendo. do you have a problem or something?

I don't have a problem.  You went out of your way to say that PlayStation + PC legally gives you access to almost every game available.  I was just pointing out that if you don't have 1 of the big 3 console platforms, there is really no point in saying "I have access to almost every game available".  You're entitled to your preference, but your second sentence in original post was both unnecessary, and yes untrue. 

Please show how many games launched for PC+X1+PS4+Switch were launched that aren't playable if you have PS4+PC... I bet that would be a number small enough to be called "almost every game".



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."