By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
Lauster said:

So according to you, Sony pays Capcom in order MHW to only avoid the Switch, and thus makes a gift to Microsoft that can also benefit from a game with an "opponent" in less for free.

Thanks to show me you're totally ignorant about how this business works. Think about the nonsense you say please (maybe elsewhere, we're pretty off-topic).

And to add this again I ask - how would Sony out moneyhat Nintendo?   Assuming the Sony is actually spending money to "keep" it from the switch (But not enough to keep it from PC and Xbox) why wouldn't Nintendo counter that? Why wouldn't Microsoft counter it?

If money was the only thing that put game A on Console B - Playstation would have no games.  The Xbox would be a bigger success than the ps2, 4, and wii combined.

Nintendo would own Japan with every game being on the 3ds and switch.

exactly why Sony paid Capcom.

anyways, why would Xbox counter? Japanese games sell little to nothing on their console, even in NA. Nintendo still owns Japan with stuff like splatoon and the fact that switch is handheld. This is Sony countering Nintendo in Japan.

playstation have a robust first and second party, and these Capcom games are third party. This is only in addition to the big exclusive library they have. Of course they won't let uncharted or Detroit or Spider-Man out of PlayStation. If this happened during ps2 generation, it would have little to no effect.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.