flashfire926 on 04 October 2017
Kyuu said:
flashfire926 said:
Lol this is a bullshit post. Number one, no one ever said Sony pays for every godamn game, just for some Capcom games. Dragon Quest builders is a square Enix games. They are also making project octopath traveller for switch. Sony paid for an ambitious monster hunter, since Capcom itself doesn't have AAA funds. Look at the production quality of Street fighter V and MvCi. Street fighter V presentation is better because Sony funded the game, and MvCi looks cheap as hell because it was Capcom themselves.
phil condones exclusive content locked for a single console, I don't know why people keep twisting that into condoning timed exclusives. It's like some of you guys haven't even read the tweet.
MH world is still available for Xbox One and PC because Sony knows that the game being on those consoles will affect the PS4 version not a single bit cause they don't have big mh fan base,so they didn't need to pay extra to remove it from there. Only the Nintendo version will deduct sales, wether it be 3DS, switch, or even Wii U, cause in Japan Wii U was ahead of PS4 in sales for a long time. They only paid enough to get it off Nintendo consoles.
|
Good job ignoring some of my key points and carrying on with the baseless theories. Not going to reply in detail but regardless of Phil's intention, his supposed hypocricy is what's getting all the negativity. So brining up that "Sony too buys exclusives!!" is not relevant. No double standards are taking place.
|
Good job on not reading the second paragraph.
Bet with Intrinsic:
The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.