By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Teriol said:
GribbleGrunger said:

Not great but I don't think Nintendo need this just yet.

I find it pretty interesting how the portability reflects on the "feel" this game gives Users in general. I mean, on the other systems, around 50 people (XBone, PC) or 130 people (PS4) have rated the game and all have user score < 5 on metacritic. Yet the Switch version has also around 50 user ratings by now and it evens out at currently 8.0. Basically, this appears to be the most satisfying FIFA version across all platforms as of right now. This even is reflected in amazon where Switch version has the highest rating across all platforms currently (4 Stars, XBone version having 3.5.). And that is even though Switch does not have all features of the main game. It's incredibly interesting to see portability mattering for this series this much.

This won't fit well with the narrative of poor sales due to bad port.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."