By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Soundwave said:

I'm in my late 30s, I've been following "Playstation" since 1992 when it was announced as the SNES CD-ROM. I think even still have EGM lying around somewhere. 

Refute any of my points, it's well known Sony money hatted things like Final Fantasy in the past (and uh well continues to do so looking at FFVII Remake), why do you think Nintendo and Square had to go to the ridiculous lengths of creating a shell company just to get even a Final Fantasy spin-off? Maybe you should do your research, I've more than done mine. 

Sony is responsible for locking more content out from other systems for no good reason than any other company by a long shot since they've entered the business. They've done it to Sega and continue to do so to Nintendo and MS. 

3 points.

Nintendo had rules that the company itself couldn't release any game at the competitor during NES, not only a specific game.

Sony haven't had their unit top level come out to say the practice is bad like MS have done.

Why would Sony pay unspeakable amount of money to keep the game only out of Switch?

Cause they want to get the upper-hand in Japan, that's why. The Xbox audience doesn't care too much about capcom and SE games. Money hatting monster hunter is a great move from them. Same goes for FfVii remake. Sony locks out content way more, just look at the activision games. Cod and Destiny both have exclusive content only available to PlayStation. Cod 4 remaster was available to both systems at the launch of infinite warfare, yet the standalone version came out a month earlier on PS4 even though the game was finished for XB1 already. That's much more scummier than this imo.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.