SpokenTruth said:
irstupid said:
Don't know who he meant, or what bill is on the floor or not.
But Hillary did tweet about banning silencers.
1. Silencers aren't called that. They are suppressors. As many have pointed out, they are still insanely loud. The whole James Bond or any movie person using a silencer and it being quit is a hollywood fabrication.
2. There has been like 2 homicides commited in like the last 10 years that involved a suppresser, and one of them was hand made one.
3. Suppressors do not work like at all on automatic rifles, which is what he used. They heat up and cause to many malfunctions. Nobody really makes them at all for those types of guns because of that.
4. He didn't use one and thus it should have no bearing on this situtation. Nothing should ever be banned on a "what if" scenerio imo.
|
Agreed on all but it's his inability to correctly say what he meant that is the issue. He meant Hillary, never said Hillary until later. He meant Republican bill but called it a Democrat bill. And Hillary tweeting is hardly the same as actual Democrats in the House voting. If he can't debate from a position of facts or without twisting it to sound like something else, it's not going to go well for him.
|
Last I checked multiple Democrats spoke up supporting Hillary’s comments. House Democrats as well as just Democrats in general. No I didn’t go into detail about the entire bill because It doesn’t matter, the issue is the Democrats idiocy when it comes to anything gun related and the insistence on passing needless laws.
