Mass shooting Las Vegas

[SvennoJ]

ArchangelMadzz said:

Mr Puggsly said:

There is validity to that argument, but again the real issue is why did this person do a mass killing? What was his motivation?

Hence, you don't need a gun to commit a mass killing.

I challenge anyone to kill 50 people in a crowd with a knife. Heck even with a pistol that would be difficult. 

There's no reason why someone needs an assault rifle for protection. 

Not that I don't agree about assault rifles having no place in civilian hands, but already forgotten about the Nice truck attack? 86 dead, 458 wounded. There are a lot more mass shootings though, but if you really want to kill a lot of people guns aren't the most efficient.

Now why does the US produce so many lunatics that think it's ok to kill a bunch of people...