fkusumot on 11 June 2008
| Kasz216 said: No it doesn't. It says the child had a swastika and the 14/88 on herself. She very well could have drawn said things on herself. It wouldn't be out of place for a child. Besides which, you've got to consider how it would be if any sign of belief on a child would be enough to start an investigation to get them taken away. For example the star and crescent. |
Yes it does. You didn't do your research. The original article in the Winnipeg paper supports my assertion. You might also consider that it's illegal in Canada to deny the Holocaust and the implications behind the swastika and the 14/88 symbol.
