Faelco said:
I hope you're joking (we can never be sure these days). Otherwise you compare blindly 2 different games and think that this comparison is worth something? That's not how it works.
Like I said, crappy games sell like crap. If Capcom releases good games on PS4, they will sell well, like all the huge sellers that we've seen lately on this console. |
So you are saying an overpriced 25 year old port on a console that released with around 2 million install base should outsell a brand new triple A title releaing on a combined install base of at least 90 million?
Like I said, if the crappy game sold like crap on Switch, Capcom would have pulled Swtch support and most people would have completely understood. But because it is the PS4, it sounds unreasonable? How about the fact that it was unreasonable to say a 25 year old port priced almost 2 to 4 times the price it is on other consoles is the test for future Switch support if you are not going to hold the other consoles to the same standard? Or how about the fact that I went through all those pages and nobody even thought about the fact that Capcom would have called their Switch effort a failure and ended support for the console and nobody would bat an eye?
I am critical of Switch all the time. I am critical of developers all the time. I am very fair with my critiques. In this case, are you saying I am wrong in my assessment? Because excusing my assessment is not discrediting it in any way, shape, or form.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000
