By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude said:
MikeB said:
jerseyboy609 said:
bbsin said:
Cremator said:
@ jersey

Based on your question it seemed you had no intelligence.

The point that you're complaining about the integrity of a fanmade PS3 youtube video on a Sony board shows that you have no intelligence.


lol, I wasn't complaining, I was just clarifying something...I didnt know that some info was false, video game knowledge is not common you know. You have to admit, the video seems to be well put together with a great deal of facts.


The overall message is pretty accurate, just some minor flaws. Some points are hard to compare directly as the technical approach is too different or official data is not readily available. BTW regarding the Cell it's far more powerful than twice the Xenon's raw performance, 360 fanboy!


And does that fact turn you on? Cause it certanly hasn't produced better games thus far.


The Cell is what has interested me the most with regard to the PS3, this from the very beginning when the Cell was announced. Finally influential companies had the balls to leave handicapping legacy bagage behind and come up with an innovative powerful new design to finally push technology progress forward in a significant way.

I think the PS3 has a similar effect on the Cell technology as it helped Blu-Ray disc to establish itself as a movie format. We will see better super computers and more powerful efficient devices based on the Cell. IMO the current ahead for its time PS3, paves the way for a slimline PS3 and PS4. Short term disadvantages to achieve long term gains.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales