rolltide101x said:
#1 Relevance? #2 So you admit that VR is not a good platform yet? The difference is Pong was FUN, people spent hours and hours with it. People still play it today to a degree. VR is supposed to blow us all away and it has fell flat to be honest. I have several friends on PSN with a PSVR that I never see them use and my personal friends also rarely use theres. Now I understand this is a small case study and there are people who love it but I have a feeling its a niche for the majority of people. |
You want the relevance of you having to move the goal post? You explain that. The relevance of people not knowing what games would become when seeing Pong shows that the fact that today you not seeing the future of VR isn't something that are certain to happen.
I admit that it can improve, some users are already loving it, I don't have that much content to play on, but I have liked it enough so far.
It may be niche, but you can't determine that based on yourself.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."