By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kerotan on 26 September 2017
Edit Thread
Carl2291 said:
Kerotan said:

Now this is nonsense. Because I've clarified on multiple occasions that the Switch doesnt need to beat this combination of consoles to be considered a success.  

But certain people including yourself continue to ignore this point time and time again. 

Like are you going to continuing ignoring it even after I just clarified again? I'll repeat it one more time just incase.  

The Switch being a success is not dependent on it outselling the consoles it's succeeding (Wii U + 3DS). 

I feel that these 2 posts and the moderation handed to you by CGI-Quality highlight your true intentions when talking about this issue, and why so many people are quick to shout you down.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8529386

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8529402

A lot of people see through it, and it was previously mentioned by other users in this thread. This is why you get shit for what you say and why nobody really believes a word that comes out of your keyboard on your true intentions when discussing Switch, Wii U and 3DS.

Edit - Let's add a couple more from that thread.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8529488

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8529438

Again, people repeatedly call you out for a reason.

I have in the past specifically said it needs to beat them to succeed but also in the past and present I've obviously said it doesn't.  In fact I've said it doesn't many more times then not.  

 

And the last few weeks I've changed my tune to it doesn't.  it can't be laid out any clearer then that.  

 

And those posts are nowhere near as bad as you sound.  For a man who regularly sites context,  you are ignoring the context here. 

 

Post #1 

Doesn't even mention it's not a success.  Even says sales are excellent. 

 

Post #2 

An overly negative post but again never says it's not a success and even says they're healthy. 

 

Post #3

I'm just talking sense so not sure why that was listed. 

 

Post #4 

Actually on second reading this talks sense aswell.  I said it only needs to sell 20m to be successful and even went as low as 15m. 

 

So what exactly are you calling out here?  I've said it more often then not that beating 3DS+Wii U is not a requirement to be successful.  so in hindsight I actually believe I used to say it had to beat them but those posts don't show it.  Maybe I've started to believe the lies people regularly talk about me on here,  when they re write my history.  Is there actually a case where I say it has to beat them? 

 

 

And I look forward to your reply to @kyuu because he's making a very valid point.