By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Spindel said:
vivster said:

Nobody said anything about making a living. In fact I didn't even say movies would make a loss. it's about increasing revenue.

A music album is listened to many times resulting in tens of hours of entertainment. Each book gives you several hours of reading time. We don't even have to be talking about video games.

An average movie has 90-120 minutes of entertainment. Unless it's a very good movie or you don't have any other hobbies a movie is watched a single time, maybe twice. Even if we're generous and say that every single movie is watched 3 times we come out at around 6h per movie. Every single music album, book or video game will top that. On average every other medium will give you more time out of a single product.

The only thing that gives you less value is a shorter movie.

Pfff...

I've watched Starship Troopers 60+ times :)

I saw it in theaters and I have it (somewhere) on DVD, it's the DVD that I've seen the most times.

 

But yeah, that's an outliner. Most movies I only watch one time.

 

Movies I can remember seeing more than once:

Starship Troopers (60+)

Das Boot (10+)

Nightmare Before Christmass (10+)

Terminator (10+)

Terminator 2 (10+)

Akira (10+)

Pacific Rim (2)

Predator (5+)

Dude Where's My Car (10+)

Robocop (5+)

Robocop 2 (10+)

But comparing the average price of movie theathers per hours watched we can see that the entretainment value can be seen as quite different for the majority of customers.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."