By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
arcaneguyver said:

Love how the attitude in this thread is so radically different from the one about Ubisoft in imminent danger of being eaten by Vivendi. In one it's "I love Ubisoft, they make interesting games" and here it;s "Well, if someone takes a dump on PC and sells it for $60, it's probably Ubisoft."

Still not certain why a PC game would not run well on a build with recommended specs. The hell does "recommended specs" even mean in that case? Not a PC guy, but would still like someone take this aspect of that platform to task - always review games at the recommended specs, nothing above, and see if the companies scramble to fix their shit.

Those that spoke positively of ubisoft in that other thread haven't shown up in this one, which is why it appears differently to the other thread.

For years Ubisoft hasn't done a good job when it came to PC ports and even now, they still haven't shown a care for creating a specific team towards porting their games to PC, so in between the years where they cited PC gamers as pirates, to now where they cba optimizing their PC ports at all, they haven't really progressed as much if at all when it comes to the PC side of things.

 

Hell, their last PC based game, Anno 2205 ran like crap, a game designed only for PC and even then it was watered down. They just don't give a crap about that market (which is why I'll always dislike them and wish for Vivendi to finish them off).

 

Oh geez, didn't mean to old "A-M said yes, now N-Z say no, why the flip flop Alphabet?!" thing. Just noting the extreme difference in tone in general is very funny to me. Guessing its console guys love Ubi & PC guys hate em, which would be logical given the disparity in product quality.