ZODIARKrebirth said:
like i said it hasn't to do with my personal taste. i was only thinking if sony would concentrate on 2 shows they could rise the output of new game announcements on 2 shows, what would mean more games for show. and i don't think if there are 6 shows in the year the quality and quantity of games would be same if there would only be 2. today making games means long developement time and even sony (with many first party studios and third party) can't always bring up enough new games to make it a great conference, but that was only my opinion. like i mentioned, i too watch every conference with a big pleasure, regardless of what type of game they announce. |
Still this doesn't explain how showing 40 very good games on 2 shows would be better for sony in sales than showing 40 very good games and other 60 good and average games on 6 shows.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







