cmay227 said:
Millions is a greatly overstated number. Maybe 500,000 deaths over the last decade. The desicion to arm what you call terrorist is before so called people were considered terrorist. That's just reaching. You'd rather let's hundreds of thousands of people die untill you took action. If a person walks into a mall with a ar15 do you wait till they kill 2, 3 , 10 , 20 people before you say. Oh shit this guy is bad news let's take him out. Or do you take him out before he has a chance to kill? Especially if there is a history of killing by this person. How many have to die before you can justify attacking someone? Give me a number. |
really? 500 000 deaths between iraq, lybia, syria in addition to other lesser conflicts? as far as i know iraq alone is over 2 million civilian deaths
what would those people have died from alternatively? saddam? so why did they put him in power to begin with and support him initially?
secondly they claimed that the reason they had to invade iraq was to find weapons of mass destruction, this was their main stated goal, not saving the people of iraq from abuse ( which would be dumb since they just ended up killing more people than he ever could and destroying their infrastructure )