By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArchangelMadzz said:
contestgamer said:

 

Why are we counting games with a meta score under 90? When comparing great years we're really only comparing great games and 80-89 is pretty mediocre and not relevant. The best way to compare years is as follows:

 

Add up the metacritic score of every game that scored over 90 in a given year. Compare the totals and you'll have the best year in gaming.

If it's not a 90 or more it's not a good game? Man all those 88's and 89's must be so ashamed of their mediocre games..

I don't even think you're being serious. If a year has 2 games that are 96 that's better than a year that has 20 85's? Are you high? 

 

What game will stick with you the most? The 2 x 96 games or the 20x85 games? The 2 96 games releases are all time great games. The 20 x 85 ones are not.