By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eva01beserk said:
VGPolyglot said:

You were saying that Muslims started the conflict, I was refuting that by showing that they have been discriminated against for decades.

So violence was the answer, gotcha. But the natives are monsters for responding again with violence.

Like thismentiel said, we wont know all the details, the press is not even allowed so rumors is all we will know untill its over or intervention occurs. But its not black and white, you cant just blame the budhist just cuz they are the ones who are on top. We know what muslim terrorism is and its wide spread, we also know that non terrorist muslims still refurse to integrate when they arrive in any forrein nation, even as refugies. Claiming the muslims started it is a bit extreme as well I admit, but knowing their history I would not absolve them of any guilt of at least instigating in some manner. While I dont know all the details I will say that I belive both partys areto blame and intervention like some want is not an option because we canot determine here who is clearly in the wrong.

What I'm saying is that the Muslims have been discriminated against for centures, but since the Buddhist majority are used to it/aren't aware of it, the government and racists can take a terrorist attack by them as justification for even more persecution.