Johnw1104 on 11 September 2017
| bonzobanana said: Developers with a low skill level that have come up with a good game concept/design. It's not that it even looks that great and still it has a slow frame rate. If they got a different developer to port the game to Switch that could actually be the best version technically because the original developers are so hopeless. That would be so funny to see and annoy so many people. Definitely seems a game best left until it's gone through about 20 update patches and costs peanuts to buy. |
I've played a lot of ARK: Survival Evolved with friends on the PC and it can definitely be a lot of fun (especially with access to the modding community). Still, there's so many games I've played that I wish they could just hand to Blizzard for six months to optimize them for weaker hardware lol, there's definitely truth to the usual Steam games featuring great ideas but less than stellar execution.
One thing I've always loved about Blizzard is how great they're able to make games look that can run on remarkably weak hardware, and that balance seems to take a lot of technical skill and experience that the average smaller and new teams lack.
