vivster on 11 September 2017
Ka-pi96 said:
Well, no. My reasoning for excluding emotional harm is because harming somebody emotionally isn't automatically an immoral act. Physical and financial harm are both observable and quantifiable whereas emotional harm is much more subjective. Thus whether emotional harm should be considered a moral/immoral (or most likely neutral) act is also subjective and varies depending on the situation and people involed. |
But by that logic physical and financial harm can be moral as well. Physical harm by law enforcement. Financial harm by credit companies.
Those actions can even be moral if done with intent.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
