Pemalite said:
Robotics will reduce the amount of unskilled available jobs. |
Probably not all jobs are going to be replaced by new jobs on the same market, but new jobs on other markets... just look at economy distribution of labor in USA 200 years ago and now. People moved from agro, to manufacture, to services in the time between. So it will be much more people oriented and services heavy economy than production.
Superman4 said:
Price controls on items like housing, not on food or food ingredients. You have a situation now where companies like Exxon make billions more every time a natural disaster happens. Regardless of if they are actually affected or not, they raise prices to increase profit. Summer time and more people driving? Raise prices. Does it actually cost more to make gasoline in the summer? No. Housing is in a similar situation, rent or even a mortgage on a house that cost maybe 20K to build is going for $1 million because of its location, cities like SF, LA etc. Setting a cap on price based on square footage would help the housing market greatly. How is my house worth 300K now when I only bought it for 150K? It sold before I bought it for 450K. It’s not a collector car, it’s a house. Making things like car insurance mandatory but not creating a limit on price only allows the companies to gouge you and leaves you defenseless against it. Creating a high minimum wage just increases inflation since now all food items will cost more, do you think the restaurants will only increase the price to offset the new labor? No, they will increase it to offset plus some and end up making more money while the person with the new "high wage" now ends paying an even higher percentage of their income for the same items. Items like electricity, gasoline, natural gas etc. are all a required item to live now. Even having Solar on your house doesn’t get you “off-grid”, you still need to keep your house connected and pay the connection fees. Once an item becomes required or mandatory it needs to 100% be regulated and pricing controlled. |
So explain how price regulation on the bread that you already understood doesn't work would suddenly work for anything else.
I already told on this very thread what happened to ALL prices being frozen in Brazil.
freedquaker said:
I am sorry, "nobody taught me?" I am a college professor in several institutions across two countries (9 months in the US, summers in another), and I know everything that they teach because I have been teaching the same things for the last decade! So please do not repeat the undergraduate introductory material to me, because pretty much all of it is either B.S. or simply inaccurate ideological propaganda. |
The real evidence of a full market like Brazil clearly showed what happened on government doing price control full scale instead of sanitizing it's own cost structure and debt heavy strategy.
And basically your solution to a market that is imperfect basically because of government control is increase government control? Makes zero sense and you know it. You may have 20 PhDs if you want, but infering that increasing something ineficient will make it efficient is bizarre to say the least.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."