Cartridges or optical discs?

[Pemalite]

Mr_No said:

Whoa, whoa, whoa, chill. I never asked for you to care about me, but I feel flattered you let me know you don't. I argue against points too and I'm not afraid to be wrong.

I am chill. I am not raging either, don't make baseless assertions.

Mr_No said:

I care about you obnoxiously replying me without me wanting for it. In fact, I'm gonna say it again:

This is a forum. In a forum people generally reply to you whether you like it or not. And there is absolutely squat you can do about it.
If you do not like that, then perhaps you should ask yourself whether a forum is an appropriate avenue to express your views.

Mr_No said:

I prefer optical discs over cartrdiges because they offer more space and better sound quality

Well. You are wrong. Carts and Optical disks have the same sound quality, both uncompressed, digital, high quality audio.

Now preferring optical disks is personal opinion, something which I can completely respect.
NAND these days can scale in capacity that exceeds optical disks, that's a fact.

So in short...

* Carts have superior load times.
* Carts have superior capacity.
* Carts can have equivalent Audio/Video quality.
* Carts are more durable.
* Carts are smaller and more portable.

And that all comes down to a single caveat. Cost. That's it. Cost.

Mr_No said:

How can that get into you? Back then cartrdiges were inferior in many ways to optical discs (but not in all ways). Sure, cartridges had faster loading times and had capabilities for better 3D graphics, but discs were cheaper to produce and offered excellent video and audio quality. And those are facts.

Then the fault is your own for not elaborating on your points to a sufficient degree.

Mr_No said:

Now, you might want not to indulge in this "less than intelligent" conversation like you stated before. So don't.

As long as my replies sit within the confines of the forum/site rules... I am not obligate to adhere to your requests.