| shikamaru317 said: Sounds to me like it would just cause a lot of inflation. |
yes... but surely the guys behind the study didn't forget that little detail... come on... give them some credit...
| Ka-pi96 said: Who's going to be paying an extra $1000 per person tax to afford that then? |
the answer is in the study, i didn't read it, but i'm sure that if they did the study the gave the answer to that. from another similar thing some people did for my country and from what i remember, the logic behind it is... the corporations that takes huge profits for having robots doing humans work... sooner or later we are going to have little things to work on and the population of the planet is growing... people will need a income from somewhere... a mechanism needs to be put in place so we can live with litle work or none if the person has no skill or talent or is plain useless just because all the works they could do are already being done by someone else... it's like, if you are fine with having a lower standard you can try to live from the "handout" but if you have more ambition than the regular joe, you can work and add to the "handout" and have a better life. Basic species survival if you look at it in its core.
in one sentence is...
money moving generate more economic growth than money sitting under a matress
|
|
Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4
