Ruler said:
AbbathTheGrim said:
With all the constant threatening from North Korea of nuking the US and our allies and recent apparent successful test of a hydrogen bomb, I was wondering what would be the position of people here that come from differnt countries regarding the idea of attacking and trying to stop NK's dictator before any possible use of such nuclear weapon happens.
The questions are as follow:
1) Are you ok with the US and Co. doing a pre-emptive strike against North Korea in an effort to stop this constant threat? If you say no, why?
2) If you think that a preemptive attack against NK should be avoided at all costs, what would be your position in a possible scenario where the procrastination of an intervention there results in North Korea striking first?
I'm polling this motherfucker so poll will be up soon.
|
NK wont strike first, the US is the agressor here with all their sanctions and military maneuvers , NK is reacting
|
Ruler, I just want to say before you delve into this, that yes, the US regime has committed atrocities and numerous horrible thigns, and yes I'd consider them a threat to the world, but remember, there isn't always a good side. The North Korean regime is terrible. However, I personally am against wat because of the innocent lives that will be lost, and because I'm weary of the US's intentions.
