Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

[Wyrdness]

Azuren said:

Wyrdness said:

Because if NK nuked Japan, SK and US before being defeated the damage inflicted would impact the economy significantly much like WW2 did as countries don't just recover from that over night. Look at Syria now and imagine Japan and SK like that along with the westcoast of the US.

"Pre-emptive" is the operative term in this thread. With that in mind, how would bombing NK in a way that would rid us of Kim Dong Un cause a collapse in the global economy?

The US for over a decade couldn't assassinate Saddam and had to resort to manufacturing a war to remove him so how are they going to strike at Kim when they don't know where he is in the country he doesn't exactly advertise his location to the west and this is a man expecting trouble to come his way, secondly like any other regime all the leaders aren't going to be in one place, just because you get Kim doesn't mean the fighting stops. US learned this the hard way in Somalia when they thought by taking out the militant leader it would all come to an end instead the hornets nest kept on heating up.

The second that bomb drops on NK both SK and Japan will become bomb sites with in hours.