| DonFerrari said: Last I heard Saddam was guillotined even though he didn't had the weapons he were supposed to have. And UK have given internal judgment you say right? Have UN sanctiioned USA for the invasion or the wrong doings? Have USA president or any official gone to Genebra? Nope I'm comparing the afterwards of war and you were unable to say what Genebra trials judged the crimes on Kosovo, Irak and other wars. |
Saddam was tried by his enemies who were already in the state long before the war not the western forces he fought and he was handed over long before the west years later admitted the wasn't any WMDs found, the western forces may not have had sanctions but we got a far more serious problem in the militants Saddam was dealing with who have carried out attack after attack against us which has lead to those involved being villains because they never had a recovery plan for Iraq and the war in the end was deemed illegal. US sure as hell doesn't have a recovery plan for any country or itself being nuked as callateral as a result.
Your point was about being judged and how history is written by the winners blah blah and Iraq proved it otherwise now you've moved goalposts to try and add sanctions into the equation and either way the corruption in western politics doesn't overule the hard fact of the perception of those involve in Iraq, it's also spelt Geneva by the way. Tbh you don't really have any point here to begin with so I don't get why you're arguing other than you wanting a pre-emptive strike and don't like people not agreeing.
