Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

[DonFerrari]

Wyrdness said:

DonFerrari said:

Villain? Perhaps... have any of them be executed or gone to trial? Nope.

Have any of NATO higher ups gone for trial over Kosovo mistakes? Nope.

Have USA and allies commited similar crimes to Germany and Japan? Yes. Have any of their officials gone to the same trials nazi guys gone? Nope. Part of losing the war and signing the rendition is accepting that you are in a way or another the one in the wrong.

No mate you're talking bullocks you claimed the loser will always be the one judge when Iraq showed us otherwise and in the UK the were officials who had to answer and give up positions for the invasion to the point they tried to scape goat one particular official who commited suicide under all the pressure so yes people did have to pay over it.

You're comparing now to over 70 years ago when things were much different as world wide law goes, a pre-emptive strike on two countries not only villified the west but triggered a wave of millitant conflicts which has lead to numerous terrorists attacks since. A pre-emptive strike against a country that likely has a H-bomb is going to be disastrous as Kim will blow up as many enemies as possible with them before he goes down which is why it's hilarious you and other people who will fight from the safety of this forum call for blood shed.

Last I heard Saddam was guillotined even though he didn't had the weapons he were supposed to have. And UK have given internal judgment you say right? Have UN sanctiioned USA for the invasion or the wrong doings? Have USA president or any official gone to Genebra?

Nope I'm comparing the afterwards of war and you were unable to say what Genebra trials judged the crimes on Kosovo, Irak and other wars.