Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

[Wyrdness]

DonFerrari said:

Wyrdness said:
A pre-emptive strike would prove North Korea right and throw politics into chaos for decades, for all you know they may just be beating their chest to try and negotiate better terms for themselves. If you strike at them first and they really do have H-bombs they not only could retaliate in a destructive manner but in a political sense they'd argue that they're defending themselves, the's also the issue that such a conflict will also empower the west's problems in the militant groups they're still battling.

You know that this is bullocks right? On war the one that lose will always be the war criminal to be judged doesn't matter what each side done or who started.

Funny because Iraq lost and everyone involved has been a villain of that since, Blair, Bush etc... This isn't the dark ages where you write your own history any more the whole world is more aware of shit going on.

Blair has desperately rallied against Corbyn despite being the same party because the latter said a wrongful invasion requires a war crime trial.