Tulipanzo said:
Ok, let's talk misrepresenting views.
In saying "the media reports the fact" I was commenting on how you claim they are somehow blowing this out of proportion.
When I say "the facts", I mean police brutality, something you also claim is happening and being reported. You seem to have trouble with context.
I never claimed that reporting couldn't be politicized, I asked in what way, given the facts, they were being politicized.
You still haven't answered.
As would be expected by now, your position, as it is finally revealed, is based on a fundamental ignorance of the basic facts, topped with a nice ad-hominem.
You don't deny police brutality, yet it's blown out of proportion by media outlets, which you haven't bothered to name, in a way you haven't bothered to explain, with consequence you haven't bothered to list.
You don't hate BLM, but their efforts are questionable, their actions stupid, and they don't represent reality.
I'd have to disagree with you.
My assesment of your position was correct: you are a stereotypical BLM hating, police brutality denying ignorant commenter; you just don't like being called out on it.
Well, pretend I was being sarcastic. Good day
|
Ad-hominem you say? I came to the conclusion that you needed to read slower since you couldn't somehow figure out where I was coming from, while others could. This led me to believe you were slow, which is obviously still evident. My conclusion was an insult, yes, but it was based on the fact you couldn't argue my points so therefore was not used in a fallacious manner. In other words (for the slow ones) I used it properly. Funny you bring up fallacies since you've been commiting straw-man's like crazy, but anyways.
As my position is finally revealed? Well, thank you for your interpretation of what I am! You being that far off the mark just goes to show how deep the bias runs. Even after I said things like "police brutality exists" you go on to say I'm a police brutality denier. Have logical day, sir!
